The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that human influence, while profound, is not yet comparable to the deep-time scale of geological processes, and that the proposed markers may not be globally synchronous. Proponents, in contrast, contend that the sheer scale and permanence of human alterations, including species extinction rates and landscape modifications, warrant a distinct designation. This debate underscores a broader tension between scientific classification and the societal implications of acknowledging humanity as a geological force.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 인정하는 것에 대한 논란의 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 제안된 지표들은 전 세계적으로 동시에 발생하는 것으로 보편적으로 인정받지 못하고 있다.
B. B. 지질학자들은 인간의 영향보다는 자연적인 기후 변동에 초점을 맞추는 것을 선호한다.
C. C. 이 개념은 인간이 지구 시스템에 영향을 미쳤다는 어떠한 증거도 결여하고 있다.
D. D. 그 시대의 사회적 함의는 고려할 가치가 없을 정도로 사소하다.
✅ 正确答案
A. The proposed markers are not universally accepted as being simultaneous across the globe.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first