The concept of 'environmental carrying capacity' has long been central to ecological studies, yet its application to human societies remains contentious. While early models focused on population limits based on food production, contemporary researchers argue that technological innovation and trade can temporarily raise carrying capacity, but often at the cost of ecological degradation. A 2019 study in *Nature Sustainability* found that high-income nations outsource resource-intensive production, effectively exporting their carrying capacity burdens to lower-income countries. This creates a global imbalance where consumption exceeds local ecological limits, leading to biodiversity loss and carbon emissions. Critics of the concept contend that it is overly deterministic, ignoring cultural adaptations and policy choices. Nevertheless, understanding these dynamic interactions is crucial for sustainable development, as static carrying capacity models fail to capture the complexities of globalized resource flows.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 전통적 수용력 모델의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 그들은 기술 혁신의 역할을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. 그들은 국제 무역과 자원 아웃소싱의 영향을 무시한다.
C. 그들은 문화적 적응에 너무 많은 초점을 맞추고 있다.
D. 그들은 모든 국가가 동일한 생태 발자국을 가지고 있다고 가정한다.
✅ 正确答案
They ignore the effects of international trade and resource outsourcing.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first