The concept of 'environmental carrying capacity' has long been central to ecological studies, yet its application to human societies remains contentious. Unlike wildlife populations, which are constrained by biological limits, human communities can expand their carrying capacity through technological innovation and trade. However, this expansion often incurs hidden costs, such as resource depletion in distant regions or the accumulation of pollutants that transcend local boundaries. Recent research suggests that a more holistic measure, termed 'ecological footprint', which accounts for both direct and indirect resource use, offers a more accurate assessment of sustainability. Nevertheless, critics argue that such metrics oversimplify complex socio-economic dynamics, potentially leading to misguided policy decisions. This debate underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecological data with economic and cultural factors when evaluating long-term sustainability.
❓ According to the passage, why is the application of 'environmental carrying capacity' to human societies problematic?
A. A. Because human populations are not subject to any resource limits.
B. B. Because technological innovation and trade allow humans to avoid all ecological consequences.
C. C. Because human expansion can mask indirect environmental costs that occur elsewhere.
D. D. Because ecological footprints are too complex to measure accurately.
✅ 正确答案
C. Because human expansion can mask indirect environmental costs that occur elsewhere.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first