The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were shaped by natural forces such as volcanic activity or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by anthropogenic markers including plastic pollution, elevated carbon dioxide levels, and the global dispersal of radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests. Proponents argue that these markers are distinct and persistent enough to warrant a formal boundary in the geological timescale. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex and uneven nature of human influence, suggesting that a more nuanced framework is needed to address regional variations in environmental change. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating scientific evidence with societal narratives about human responsibility for the planet's future.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세 개념에 대한 비판자들이 제기하는 핵심 주장은 무엇인가?
A. 인간이 지구에 미치는 영향은 새로운 지질 시대를 정의할 만큼 충분히 중요하지 않다.
B. B) 이 개념은 지역별 인간 영향의 다양성과 복잡성을 설명하지 못한다.
C. C) 방사성 동위원소는 인간 활동의 신뢰할 수 있는 지표가 아니다.
D. D) 지질 시대 구분은 더 많은 자연적 힘을 포함하도록 개정되어야 한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) The concept fails to account for the variability and complexity of human influence across regions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first