The concept of 'environmental determinism' posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions. While this theory gained prominence in the 19th century, it was later criticized for oversimplifying the complex interplay between culture and environment. Modern scholarship, however, has revived interest in a nuanced version of this idea, termed 'neo-environmentalism.' This approach acknowledges that environmental factors can influence economic productivity and political stability, but it rejects the deterministic view that geography alone dictates outcomes. Instead, it emphasizes the role of human innovation and institutional adaptation in mitigating or amplifying environmental constraints. For instance, countries with similar tropical climates often exhibit divergent economic trajectories, suggesting that policy decisions and historical contexts are equally critical. Thus, neo-environmentalism offers a balanced framework for understanding global disparities without falling into geographical reductionism.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 전통적 환경 결정론과 신환경주의의 주요 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 신환경주의는 지리학이 사회에 미치는 어떠한 영향도 완전히 거부한다.
B. 신환경주의는 환경적 요인보다 인간적 요인을 더 중요하게 여긴다.
C. 신환경주의는 환경적 영향을 인정하면서도 인간의 행위성을 허용한다.
D. 신환경주의는 문화적 발전보다 오직 경제적 결과에만 초점을 맞춘다.
✅ 正确答案
Neo-environmentalism allows for human agency while acknowledging environmental impact.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first