The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, referring to the current epoch in which human activities have become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks a distinct and globally synchronous boundary, unlike the transitions between previous epochs. Moreover, some scholars suggest that framing the Anthropocene as a geological event, rather than an epoch, better captures its complex, multi-scalar nature. This debate underscores a broader tension between scientific classification and the need to communicate the urgency of environmental change.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 비판자들이 인류세를 공식적으로 지질학적 시대로 인정하는 것에 반대하는 핵심 논거는 무엇인가?
A. A) 이 용어는 지질학자가 아닌 사람에 의해 대중화되었다.
B. B) 그 시작을 표시하는 명확하고 전 지구적으로 동시적인 경계는 존재하지 않는다.
C. C) 인간의 영향이 지질 층을 변화시킬 만큼 충분히 크지 않다.
D. D) 이 개념은 기후 변화에 효과적으로 대응하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) There is no clear and globally synchronous boundary marking its start.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first