The concept of 'environmental determinism' posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and geography, directly shapes human behavior and societal development. This theory, popular in the 19th and early 20th centuries, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and technological innovation, while tropical regions were associated with lethargy and stagnation. However, modern scholarship has largely rejected this deterministic view, noting that it oversimplifies complex cultural and historical processes. Critics point to counterexamples such as the advanced civilizations that flourished in the tropics, including the Maya and the Khmer Empire, which developed sophisticated agriculture, architecture, and governance systems. Instead, contemporary geographers emphasize 'possibilism', the idea that the environment offers a set of constraints and opportunities, but human agency, cultural values, and historical contingencies ultimately determine outcomes. This shift reflects a broader academic trend toward understanding human-environment interactions as dynamic and reciprocal, rather than unidirectional.
❓ 현대 학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 기후가 사회를 형성하는 역할을 무시한다.
B. B) 그것은 열대 문명이 왜 발전했는지를 설명하지 못한다.
C. C) 그것은 환경적 요인보다 인간의 행위성을 과도하게 강조한다.
D. D) 그것은 19세기에만 인기가 있었고 지금은 구식이다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It fails to explain why tropical civilizations were advanced.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first