The concept of 'environmental resilience' has gained traction in ecological studies, referring to an ecosystem's capacity to absorb disturbances while maintaining its core functions. Recent research by Thompson et al. (2022) suggests that resilience is not a static property but varies with the intensity and frequency of stressors. For instance, coral reefs exhibit remarkable recovery after mild bleaching events, yet prolonged thermal stress can trigger a regime shift to algal-dominated states, from which return is unlikely. This underscores the importance of temporal dynamics in assessing ecosystem health. Critics argue, however, that focusing solely on resilience may overlook the intrinsic value of pristine habitats, which are irreplaceable regardless of their adaptive potential. Thus, while resilience offers a pragmatic framework for conservation, it should complement, not replace, biodiversity preservation efforts.
❓ この文章によると、環境の回復力だけに焦点を当てることの主な限界は何ですか?
A. それは生態系の回復における人間の介入の役割を無視している。
B. それは、手つかずの自然生息地の重要性を過小評価する可能性がある。
C. 軽微な擾乱の影響を考慮していない。
D. 生態系は常に元の状態に戻ることができると仮定している。
✅ 正确答案
It may undervalue the importance of untouched natural habitats.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first