The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards borne by marginalized communities. Unlike traditional environmentalism, which often focuses on wilderness preservation or wildlife protection, environmental justice explicitly links ecological degradation to social inequality. Scholars argue that polluting industries and waste facilities are frequently sited in low-income neighborhoods or regions inhabited by ethnic minorities, largely due to weaker political representation and limited economic resources. This pattern is not accidental but reflects systemic biases in land-use planning and regulatory enforcement. Consequently, environmental justice advocates demand not only the equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens but also meaningful public participation in decision-making processes. Recent studies indicate that incorporating community voices leads to more sustainable outcomes, as local knowledge often identifies risks overlooked by external experts. However, critics caution that procedural reforms alone cannot address deeper structural inequities rooted in capitalism and historical discrimination. Thus, the field remains contested, with ongoing debates over the most effective strategies to achieve both ecological health and social fairness.
❓ 根据文章所述,传统环保主义与环境正义之间的一个关键区别是什么?
A. 传统环保主义关注社会不平等,而环境正义则优先考虑野生动物保护。
B. 环境正义将环境问题与社会不平等联系起来,而传统环境保护主义往往侧重于荒野或野生动物。
C. 环境正义主要关注保护原始地区,这与传统环境保护主义有所不同。
D. 传统环保主义倡导公众参与,但环境正义并不如此。
✅ 正确答案
Environmental justice links environmental issues to social inequality, whereas traditional environmentalism often emphasizes wilderness or wildlife.