The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has been a subject of considerable debate among economists and environmentalists. Originally coined in the 1950s, it refers to the deliberate design of products with a limited useful life, encouraging consumers to purchase replacements more frequently. Proponents argue that this strategy stimulates economic growth by driving demand and fostering innovation, as companies continuously develop new models with enhanced features. However, critics contend that planned obsolescence exacerbates environmental degradation by increasing waste and resource consumption. They advocate for a shift toward a circular economy, where products are designed for durability, repairability, and recyclability. Recent studies suggest that while such a transition may reduce short-term profits for manufacturers, it could yield long-term economic and ecological benefits by lowering production costs and preserving natural resources. The challenge lies in balancing consumer expectations for innovation with the imperative of sustainability.
❓ 비판자들이 계획적 노후화에 대해 제기하는 주요 주장은 무엇인가?
A. 혁신과 경제 성장을 장려한다.
B. B) 이는 증가된 폐기물을 통해 환경 피해를 초래합니다.
C. C) 제품 교체의 필요성을 줄여줍니다.
D. D) 모든 이해관계자에게 동등하게 이익이 되는 전략이다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It leads to environmental harm through increased waste.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first