The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained significant traction in environmental policy discussions. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes and to absorb the waste it generates, given prevailing technology and resource management. This metric reveals disparities between nations: high-income countries often exhibit footprints far exceeding their biocapacity, leading to 'ecological overshoot' where demand surpasses local supply. This overshoot is typically offset through imports, effectively outsourcing environmental degradation to less developed regions. Critics argue that the footprint metric oversimplifies complex interdependencies, ignoring technological innovations that may reduce future resource intensity. Nevertheless, proponents contend that it provides a stark, quantifiable warning about unsustainable consumption patterns. Understanding this tool is crucial for policymakers aiming to balance economic development with ecological limits, though its application requires careful contextualization to avoid misleading conclusions.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика концепции экологического следа?
A. A) Он переоценивает биологическую ёмкость стран с высоким уровнем дохода.
B. B) Он не учитывает деградацию окружающей среды в развивающихся регионах.
C. C) Это упрощает сложные взаимодействия и упускает из виду потенциальные технологические улучшения.
D. D) Он не учитывает импорт ресурсов из других стран.
✅ 正确答案
C) It simplifies complex interactions and overlooks potential technological improvements.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first