The concept of 'sustainable development' has evolved significantly since its introduction in the 1987 Brundtland Report. Initially framed as a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, it has since expanded to encompass social equity and intergenerational justice. Critics argue, however, that the term has become so broad as to be practically meaningless, often co-opted by corporations to justify unsustainable practices under the guise of 'green' initiatives. Proponents counter that its flexibility allows for adaptation across diverse cultural and economic contexts, fostering local solutions to global challenges. Recent scholarship emphasizes the need for measurable indicators to move beyond rhetoric, suggesting that without concrete metrics, sustainable development risks remaining an aspirational ideal rather than a practical framework for policy.
❓ 根据文章内容,对“可持续发展”一词的主要批评是什么?
A. A. 它过于注重经济增长,却以牺牲环境为代价。
B. B. 它已变得如此模糊,以至于可以被用来为有害活动辩护。
C. C. 它仅适用于西方文化背景。
D. D. 它缺乏任何学术学者的支持。
✅ 正确答案
B. It has become so vague that it can be used to justify harmful activities.