The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were characterized by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic factors such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that these markers are distinct and globally synchronous, justifying a formal boundary. However, critics contend that the term lacks precision, as human impacts have been gradual and uneven across regions, making a single start date problematic. They suggest that 'Anthropocene' is more a cultural or historical label than a rigorous geological unit. This debate highlights a tension between scientific classification and societal narrative, raising questions about how we define our current era.
❓ 지질학자들 사이에서 인류세에 관한 주요 의견 차이는 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 영향이 정말로 지구적 범위에 이르는지 여부
B. 이 용어가 공식적인 지질 시대 구분으로 간주되어야 하는지, 아니면 문화적 개념으로 간주되어야 하는지에 대한 문제입니다.
C. 핵 낙진이 플라스틱 오염보다 더 중요한 지표인지 여부
D. 인류세가 산업 혁명 이전에 시작되었는지 이후에 시작되었는지에 대한 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the term should be considered a formal geological epoch or a cultural concept
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first