The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that climate and topography fundamentally shape human civilization, influencing everything from economic development to cultural temperament. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for its potential to justify colonial ideologies. Modern scholarship instead embraces 'possibilism', which posits that while the environment offers a range of possibilities, human agency and technology play a decisive role in choosing among them. This shift reflects a broader recognition of the reciprocal nature of the relationship: humans not only adapt to their surroundings but also actively modify them, often with unintended consequences such as climate change. Thus, contemporary geography emphasizes a nuanced, dynamic model that accounts for both environmental constraints and human creativity.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 현대 학계는 초기 환경 결정론과 어떻게 다른가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 사회에 대한 환경의 어떤 영향도 완전히 거부한다.
B. B. 그것은 환경을 인간의 결정에 아무런 역할도 하지 않는 수동적인 배경으로 본다.
C. C. 환경적 영향을 인정하지만 인간의 주체성과 개조를 강조한다.
D. D. 그것은 기술이 인간을 환경적 제약으로부터 완전히 독립적으로 만들었다고 주장한다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It acknowledges environmental influences but highlights human agency and modification.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first