The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated greenhouse gas levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than geological, as human activities exhibit variability across time and space, lacking a synchronous global boundary. They suggest that emphasizing a single start date oversimplifies complex, long-term human-environment interactions. Despite this debate, the Anthropocene concept serves a crucial heuristic purpose, prompting interdisciplinary research into planetary boundaries and fostering discussions about sustainability and ethical stewardship. Whether or not it is formally adopted, its influence on scientific and public discourse underscores the need for reflexive examination of humanity's role in shaping the planet's future.
❓ 학자들 사이에서 인류세(Anthropocene)에 관한 주요 의견 차이는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간 활동이 지구 시스템에 측정 가능한 영향을 미쳤는지 여부.
B. B. 인류세(Anthropocene)가 지질학적 시대(epoch)로 간주되어야 하는지, 아니면 문화적 개념으로 간주되어야 하는지의 여부.
C. C. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염 중 어느 것이 더 중요한 지표인지.
D. D. 학제 간 연구가 지구의 한계를 효과적으로 다룰 수 있는지 여부.
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the Anthropocene should be considered a geological epoch or a cultural concept.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first