The concept of ecosystem services has gained significant traction in environmental policy over the past two decades. These services, which include provisioning resources like food and water, regulating processes such as climate and flood control, and cultural benefits like recreation, are often undervalued in economic markets. This undervaluation stems from their public-good nature, leading to overexploitation and degradation. To address this, scholars have proposed mechanisms like payment for ecosystem services (PES), where beneficiaries compensate stewards for maintaining these services. However, critics argue that commodifying nature may undermine intrinsic values and fail to address root causes of environmental decline. Despite debates, integrating ecosystem services into decision-making frameworks has reshaped conservation strategies, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary approaches that balance ecological integrity with human well-being.