The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by profound human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that the proposed start date, often placed in the mid-20th century, is arbitrary. They suggest that focusing on a single epoch obscures the long history of human influence, which began with early agriculture and deforestation thousands of years ago. This debate reflects broader tensions in science between precise classification and the messy realities of planetary change. Ultimately, whether or not the Anthropocene is formally adopted, its discussion forces a reevaluation of humanity's role in shaping the planet's future.
❓ 과학자들 사이에서 인류세에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간이 지구에 미치는 영향이 연구할 만큼 충분히 중요한지 여부
B. 인간 영향의 복잡성과 시기를 해당 용어가 적절히 포착하는지 여부
C. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염이 타당한 층서학적 지표인지 여부
D. 인류세가 현재의 시대로서 홀로세를 대체해야 하는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the term adequately captures the complexity and timing of human influence
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first