The concept of 'environmental footprint' has evolved significantly since its introduction in the 1990s. Initially, it focused primarily on carbon emissions, but contemporary assessments incorporate a broader range of ecological impacts, including water usage, land degradation, and biodiversity loss. This shift reflects a growing recognition that sustainability cannot be achieved by addressing a single metric in isolation. For instance, a product may have a low carbon footprint yet require excessive water during manufacturing, thereby offsetting its environmental benefit. Consequently, researchers now advocate for a holistic life-cycle assessment that evaluates all stages of production, from raw material extraction to disposal. Such comprehensive analysis, however, presents methodological challenges, particularly in standardizing data across different industries and regions. Despite these difficulties, the trend toward multi-dimensional footprinting is essential for informed policy-making, as it enables more accurate trade-offs and prioritization of environmental actions.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 탄소 배출에만 집중하던 것에서 더 포괄적인 환경 발자국 평가로 전환한 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 탄소 배출은 더 이상 심각한 환경 문제로 간주되지 않는다.
B. B. 단일 지표로는 생태적 영향의 전체 범위를 포착할 수 없어, 잠재적으로 오해를 불러일으키는 결론을 초래할 수 있다.
C. C. 수명주기 평가는 탄소 배출량만 측정하는 것보다 수행하기 더 쉽다.
D. D. 정책 입안자들은 환경 규제를 정당화하기 위해 더 복잡한 데이터를 필요로 한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. A single metric cannot capture the full range of ecological impacts, leading to potentially misleading conclusions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first