雅思阅读

📖 Reading Passage

The concept of 'environmental refugee' has gained traction in recent decades, yet its legal definition remains contentious. Unlike traditional refugees who flee persecution, environmental migrants are often displaced by slow-onset disasters such as sea-level rise or desertification. This distinction matters because international law, particularly the 1951 Refugee Convention, does not recognize environmental factors as grounds for asylum. Consequently, affected populations fall into a legal vacuum, lacking formal protection or resettlement assistance. Scholars argue that this gap reflects an outdated framework that fails to address the complex realities of climate-induced mobility. Some propose extending the definition of 'refugee' to include environmental causes, while others advocate for a separate legal instrument. However, both approaches face political resistance from states wary of creating new obligations. Thus, the plight of environmental refugees highlights the urgent need for international cooperation to develop adaptive legal mechanisms that safeguard human dignity in an era of accelerating climate change.