The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction among geologists and environmental scientists, who argue that human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous geological epochs, which were defined by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Some scholars contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven impacts of human activity, while others question whether the proposed markers, such as the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration,' truly represent a global boundary in the stratigraphic record. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between scientific precision and the broader cultural resonance of naming a new geological era.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세의 공식적 인정이 논란이 되는 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동이 아직 심각한 환경 변화를 초래하지 않았기 때문이다.
B. 일부에서는 그 용어가 인간 활동의 다양한 영향을 무시하고 있으며, 제안된 지표들의 타당성도 간과하고 있다고 주장하기 때문이다.
C. 지질학자들은 인간의 영향보다는 자연적인 기후 변화에 초점을 맞추는 것을 선호하기 때문이다.
D. '대가속'이 너무 일찍 발생하여 지구적 경계로 간주되기에는 이르기 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
Because some argue the term ignores the varying effects of human actions and the validity of its proposed markers.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first