The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in recent decades, positing that human activities have become the dominant force shaping Earth's geology and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains debated among scientists. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct human-driven era. However, skeptics contend that these signals are too variable and recent to meet the strict criteria for a geological time unit, which typically spans thousands or millions of years. This debate underscores a deeper tension between scientific classification and the urgency of addressing human impact on the planet.
❓ 本文によると、一部の科学者が人新世を地質時代として正式に認めることに反対する主な理由は何か。
A. A. 人間の活動は環境に永久的な変化を引き起こしていない。
B. B. 人間の影響の証拠は一貫性に欠け、短期的すぎて地質学的基準に適合しない。
C. C. その用語は、十分な査読を受けずに一人の科学者によって広められた。
D. D. 核降下物やプラスチック汚染は地質学的記録では検出できない。
✅ 正确答案
B. The evidence of human impact is too inconsistent and short-term to fit geological standards.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first