The concept of 'environmental determinism', which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been a subject of intense debate among geographers. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and innovation, while tropical regions were presumed to hinder progress. However, this theory has been widely criticized for its oversimplification and implicit biases. Modern scholarship emphasizes the role of human agency and technological adaptation, suggesting that environmental factors are merely one of many variables influencing cultural evolution. Critics also point out that deterministic frameworks often ignore historical contingencies and the complex interplay between societies and their environments, leading to reductive conclusions that can justify colonialism or inequality. Thus, while the environment undeniably presents constraints and opportunities, its influence is mediated by social structures, knowledge systems, and historical context, rendering any straightforward causal link between geography and societal outcomes untenable.
❓ 본문에 따르면 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 사회 발전에 있어 인간의 주체적 역할을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. 기후가 기술 혁신에 미치는 영향을 설명하지 못한다.
C. 이는 사회적 결과를 단순하게 환경적 요인에 귀속시키면서 다른 복잡성을 무시한다.
D. 이는 열대 지역의 증거에만 기반을 두고 있습니다.
✅ 正确答案
It simplistically attributes societal outcomes to environmental factors while ignoring other complexities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first