The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human behavior, cultural development, and societal structures. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered industriousness and innovation, while tropical regions were associated with perceived laziness or stagnation. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its Eurocentric bias and oversimplification of complex human-environment interactions. Modern scholarship emphasizes 'possibilism', which suggests that the environment offers a set of constraints and opportunities, but human agency, technology, and cultural values ultimately determine outcomes. For instance, the Netherlands has thrived despite a cold, damp climate through engineering and trade, while resource-rich nations may suffer from political instability. Thus, while environmental factors are significant, they are not deterministic. Understanding this nuanced relationship is crucial for addressing contemporary issues like climate change adaptation, where responses vary widely across societies.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 결정론의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 기후가 사회를 형성하는 역할을 무시한다.
B. 그것은 인간의 주체성과 기술을 지나치게 강조한다.
C. 그것은 문화적 및 기술적 적응을 설명하지 못한다.
D. 열대 지역에만 적용됩니다.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for cultural and technological adaptations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first