The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal adoption as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left indelible marks on the Earth's strata, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. These markers, they claim, are as distinct as those that define previous geological boundaries. Critics, however, contend that the term is more cultural or political than scientific, pointing to the difficulty of establishing a single, globally synchronous start date for human impact, given that its effects have been diachronous across different regions. Moreover, some geologists fear that formalizing the Anthropocene could oversimplify the complex, ongoing interactions between human systems and the natural world, potentially undermining the precision required for stratigraphic classification.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 비평가들이 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 환경에 대한 영향은 전 세계적으로 너무 균일하여 뚜렷한 경계를 정의하기 어렵다.
B. B. 인간 활동의 흔적은 이전 시대의 그것들만큼 지질학적으로 중요하지 않다.
C. C. 인간의 영향이 시작된 시기는 지역에 따라 다르므로, 단일한 전 지구적 시작 시점을 설정하기 어렵다.
D. D. '인류세'라는 용어는 지나치게 과학적이며 문화적·정치적 요인을 간과한다.
✅ 正确答案
C. The start of human influence varies by region, making a single global start date difficult to establish.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first