The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has been a subject of debate among economists and environmentalists alike. Originally introduced in the 1920s to stimulate economic growth by encouraging consumer spending, this strategy involves designing products with a limited useful life, prompting consumers to replace them regularly. While proponents argue that it drives innovation and maintains market dynamism, critics contend that it leads to resource depletion and excessive waste. Recent studies suggest that a shift toward 'circular economy' models, which prioritize durability and reparability, could mitigate these negative effects without necessarily hampering economic progress. However, implementing such models requires significant changes in manufacturing practices and consumer behavior, posing substantial challenges for industries accustomed to rapid turnover.
❓ 根据文章内容,批评计划性淘汰的人士提出的主要论点是什么?
A. 这阻碍了技术创新和市场竞争力。
B. 这导致了自然资源的过度消耗和废弃物的增加。
C. 这使得产品对普通消费者来说过于昂贵。
D. 这是一种过时的经济策略,已不再奏效。
✅ 正确答案
It results in overconsumption of natural resources and increased waste.