The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term overstates humanity's uniform influence, as its effects are unevenly distributed across regions and socioeconomic groups. Moreover, they suggest that formalizing the epoch may overshadow the nuanced responsibilities of specific industries and policies. This debate reflects a broader tension between scientific classification and sociopolitical narrative, where the naming of an era can shape public perception and environmental governance. Ultimately, the decision to formalize the Anthropocene hinges not only on geological evidence but also on how such a label influences collective action toward sustainability.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 이는 인간의 영향이 집단별로 불평등하게 분포되어 있다는 점을 설명하지 못한다.
B. B. 핵 낙진만을 증거로 삼아 다른 지표들을 무시하고 있다.
C. C. 그것은 산업들이 지속 가능한 관행을 채택하는 것을 방해할 것이다.
D. D. 그것은 지난 세기의 불충분한 층서 데이터에 기반을 두고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
A. It fails to account for the unequal distribution of human impacts across different groups.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first