The concept of 'environmental determinism,' which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been largely discredited in modern geography. Critics argue that it oversimplifies complex cultural interactions and ignores human agency. However, recent research in climate science has revived interest in the relationship between environmental stressors and societal resilience. For instance, studies of ancient civilizations suggest that societies with flexible resource management strategies were better able to adapt to prolonged droughts, while rigid hierarchical structures often collapsed. This does not imply causation, but rather highlights how environmental factors can act as catalysts within a broader socio-political context. Thus, contemporary scholarship advocates for a nuanced approach, recognizing the environment as one of many interacting variables, rather than a sole determinant.
❓ 文章によると、環境決定論が批判されてきた主な理由は何ですか?
A. それは、気候が社会を形成する役割を無視している。
B. それは人間の選択と文化の複雑さを考慮に入れていない。
C. それは古代文明の柔軟性を過度に強調している。
D. 最近の気候研究による裏付けが不足している。
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for human choice and cultural complexity.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first