The concept of 'digital twins' has gained significant traction in urban planning, referring to virtual replicas of physical cities that simulate real-time data to optimize infrastructure. While proponents argue that these models enhance efficiency in traffic management and energy consumption, critics caution against over-reliance on predictive algorithms, which may overlook socio-economic disparities embedded in urban fabrics. A recent study in Rotterdam demonstrated that digital twins improved flood response times by 30%, yet also revealed that data gaps in low-income districts led to suboptimal resource allocation. This paradox underscores a fundamental tension: technological precision does not inherently equate to equitable outcomes. Therefore, scholars advocate for integrating community feedback into these systems, ensuring that algorithmic governance does not marginalize vulnerable populations. Ultimately, the efficacy of digital twins hinges not merely on data fidelity, but on the inclusivity of their design parameters.
❓ 디지털 트윈이 도시 계획에 도입될 때 제기되는 주요 우려 사항은 무엇인가요?
A. A. 그것들은 대부분의 도시들이 시행하기에는 너무 비싸다.
B. B. 빈곤 지역의 불완전한 데이터로 인해 불평등을 악화시킬 수 있다.
C. C. 그들은 홍수 대응을 실시간으로 정확히 예측할 수 없다.
D. D. 그들은 교통 관리보다 에너지 소비를 우선시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They may worsen inequality due to incomplete data in poorer areas.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first