The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes and to absorb the waste it generates, given prevailing technology and resource management. While originally developed for national-level accounting, the footprint has been adapted for various scales, from cities to products. Critics argue that the metric oversimplifies complex environmental interactions and fails to account for technological innovations that might reduce future resource demands. Nevertheless, proponents contend that it provides a powerful communicative tool, translating abstract environmental degradation into tangible spatial terms that resonate with policymakers and the public alike. The ongoing debate underscores the tension between quantitative precision and practical utility in environmental science.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий относительно метрики экологического следа, как описано в отрывке?
A. A) Это игнорирует роль технологий в снижении будущих потребностей в ресурсах.
B. B) Это слишком сложно для политиков, чтобы понять и эффективно использовать.
C. C) Это может пожертвовать точностью ради простоты общения.
D. D) Это относится только к оценкам на национальном уровне, а не к более мелким масштабам.
✅ 正确答案
C) It may sacrifice accuracy for the sake of easy communication.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first