The concept of 'environmental determinism,' which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, dominated geographic thought in the early twentieth century. However, scholars like Carl Sauer later challenged this view, arguing that culture, not environment, is the primary agent in shaping landscapes. Sauer's 'cultural landscape' approach emphasized human agency and the symbolic meanings embedded in physical spaces. This shift marked a move from a passive view of humans responding to nature to an active role where human activities transform the environment. Recent studies have further nuanced this debate, suggesting that while environmental factors can set constraints, they do not dictate outcomes, and that technological and social innovations often allow societies to adapt or even overcome these constraints, as seen in arid regions with advanced irrigation systems.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 칼 자우어와 같은 학자들이 환경 결정론에 대해 제기하는 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 기술이 인간 사회를 형성하는 역할을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. 기후가 농업 관행에 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
C. 그것은 문화와 인간의 행위성이 환경을 변화시키는 데 있어서의 역할을 과소평가한다.
D. 그것은 모든 환경이 인간 정착에 동등하게 적합하다고 잘못 가정한다.
✅ 正确答案
It underestimates the role of culture and human agency in modifying the environment.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first