The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and terrain, fundamentally shapes human societies, influencing their economic activities, cultural practices, and even political structures. While early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, critics contend that such views oversimplify complex human-environment interactions and often carry ethnocentric biases. Modern scholarship tends to favor 'possibilism', which acknowledges environmental constraints but emphasizes human agency and technological innovation as key drivers of societal development. This shift reflects a broader recognition that environmental factors are but one variable in a multifaceted equation, and that human adaptability can overcome many natural limitations, albeit not without significant costs.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 사회 발전에서 기술의 역할을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. B) 그것은 기후가 인간 활동에 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
C. C) 그것은 인간-환경 상호작용을 지나치게 단순화하며 민족중심적일 수 있다.
D. D) 물리적 환경이 문화에 미치는 영향을 고려하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
C) It oversimplifies human-environment interactions and may be ethnocentric.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first