The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early theorists argued that climate and topography directly shape human behavior and societal development, suggesting that civilizations in temperate zones were inherently more advanced. However, this view has been largely discredited for its oversimplification and potential to justify colonialism. Modern geographers emphasize 'possibilism', where environment offers a range of possibilities, but human agency and cultural innovation play decisive roles. For instance, the Netherlands, despite its cold, wet climate, achieved agricultural and economic prosperity through technological interventions like windmills and land reclamation. This shift reflects a broader academic move from passive adaptation to active transformation, acknowledging that while environment constrains, it does not determine outcomes. Thus, contemporary research focuses on the dynamic interplay between ecological conditions and human decision-making, rather than simplistic causal links.
❓ 현대 지리학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부한 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 기후가 사회를 형성하는 역할을 무시했다.
B. B) 그것은 너무 단순했고 식민주의 이데올로기를 지지했다.
C. C) 그것은 온대 지역에만 초점을 맞추었다.
D. D) 기술 발전을 고려하지 못했다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It was too simplistic and supported colonial ideologies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first