The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate in geography. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that climate and topography directly shape human behavior and societal development. However, this view was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural and economic factors. Modern scholars advocate for 'possibilism', which posits that the environment offers a range of possibilities, and human agency ultimately determines the outcome. This shift reflects a broader trend in social sciences toward acknowledging human adaptability and technological innovation, even in harsh environments like deserts or polar regions. Yet, recent studies on climate change impacts suggest that environmental constraints, particularly in vulnerable regions, can still limit developmental choices, reigniting interest in a nuanced form of determinism that incorporates both environmental limits and human resilience.
❓ この文章によると、環境決定論と可能論の主な違いは何ですか?
A. 決定論は人間の主体性を無視する一方、可能論はそれを強調する。
B. 決定論は気候に焦点を当てる一方、可能論は技術に焦点を当てる。
C. 決定論は時代遅れであり、一方で可能論は今日では広く受け入れられている。
D. 決定論は極地に適用され、可能論は砂漠に適用される。
✅ 正确答案
Determinism ignores human agency, while possibilism emphasizes it.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first