The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct human-driven era. However, critics contend that the term lacks formal precision, as human activities have altered the environment for millennia, and the proposed markers may not be globally synchronous or permanent in the geological record. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the broader narrative of human influence, raising questions about how we define and periodize our own impact on the planet.
❓ 根据文章,对“人类世”作为正式地质时代的一个主要批评是:
A. A) 人間の環境への影響は、測定するにはあまりにも最近のものである。
B. B) 提案されたマーカーは、時間や場所を問わず一貫性がない可能性がある。
C. C) 二酸化炭素濃度は大幅には上昇していない。
D. D) 地質学者たちは政治的な理由からその用語を満場一致で拒否している。
✅ 正确答案
B) the proposed markers may not be consistent across time and space.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first