The concept of linguistic relativity, often associated with the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, posits that the structure of a language influences its speakers' cognition and perception of the world. While strong versions of this hypothesis, suggesting that language determines thought, have been largely discredited, contemporary research supports a weaker form. For instance, studies on color perception show that speakers of languages with distinct color terms, such as Russian's differentiation between light and dark blue, exhibit faster and more categorical discrimination between those colors than speakers of languages lacking such distinctions. However, these effects are typically limited to tasks requiring verbal memory, and they diminish when participants engage in non-verbal interference tasks. Thus, language appears to serve as a tool for thought rather than a prison, shaping habitual attention but not constraining fundamental cognitive abilities.
❓ According to the passage, what is the current scientific consensus regarding linguistic relativity?
A. A) Language completely determines how individuals perceive and think about the world.
B. B) Language has no measurable impact on cognition or perception.
C. C) Language influences certain cognitive processes, but does not entirely restrict them.
D. D) The effects of language on thought are only observed in color perception tasks.
✅ 正确答案
C) Language influences certain cognitive processes, but does not entirely restrict them.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first