The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term lacks precise temporal boundaries, as human influence has been gradual rather than abrupt, and that formalizing such an epoch may oversimplify the complex interactions between natural and anthropogenic processes. Despite this debate, the Anthropocene concept has proven valuable beyond geology, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue about humanity's role in shaping planetary systems and informing policy discussions on sustainability. Thus, while its geological status remains contested, its heuristic power in highlighting the scale of human impact is widely acknowledged.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная причина, по которой некоторые ученые выступают против формализации антропоцена как геологической эпохи?
A. A. Маркеры человеческой деятельности недостаточно различимы, чтобы их можно было идентифицировать в горных породах.
B. B. Концепция была слишком сильно подвержена влиянию политических повесток, а не научных доказательств.
C. C. Влияние человека на Землю было постепенным, что затрудняет определение чёткой отправной точки.
D. D. Этот термин не приобрёл достаточной популярности среди учёных-экологов.
✅ 正确答案
C. Human influence on Earth has been gradual, making it difficult to define a clear starting point.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first