The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved from a localized concern into a global framework for addressing the disproportionate environmental burdens borne by marginalized communities. Initially rooted in the civil rights movement of the 1980s in the United States, it highlighted how hazardous waste sites and polluting industries were often located near low-income neighborhoods and communities of color. Over time, scholars have expanded this notion to include not only the distribution of environmental harms but also the procedural fairness in decision-making processes and the recognition of diverse cultural and historical relationships with the environment. This broader interpretation underscores that effective environmental policy must integrate social equity, ensuring that no group bears an unjust share of negative environmental consequences. However, critics argue that the framework's expansion risks diluting its original focus on racial discrimination, potentially weakening its legal and political efficacy. Despite such debates, environmental justice remains a critical lens through which to examine the intersection of ecological sustainability and human rights.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 확장된 환경 정의 개념에 대한 잠재적 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 유해 폐기물 처리장 문제를 해결하지 못하고 있다.
B. 그것은 인종 차별에 대한 원래의 강조점을 잃을 수도 있다.
C. 절차적 공정성에 너무 치중하고 있다.
D. 시민권 운동의 역할을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
It may lose its original emphasis on racial discrimination.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first