The concept of 'sustainable development' has evolved significantly since its introduction in the 1987 Brundtland Report. Initially framed as a balance between economic growth and environmental protection, it has since expanded to include social equity and intergenerational justice. Critics argue, however, that the term remains inherently vague, allowing governments and corporations to adopt superficial policies that fail to address systemic ecological degradation. Proponents counter that its flexibility enables adaptation across diverse cultural and economic contexts, fostering incremental progress. Recent research emphasizes the need for measurable indicators, such as carbon footprints and resource efficiency, to move beyond rhetoric. Yet, even with quantifiable targets, implementation often falters due to political inertia and unequal global power dynamics. Thus, sustainable development remains a contested but indispensable framework for navigating the complexities of modern environmental policy.
❓ Según el pasaje, ¿cuál es una razón principal por la que se critica el desarrollo sostenible?
A. A. Se centra demasiado en el crecimiento económico a expensas del medio ambiente.
B. B. Es demasiado rígido para ser aplicado en diferentes contextos culturales.
C. C. Su definición es demasiado amplia, lo que permite medidas superficiales.
D. D. Carece de indicadores medibles para el seguimiento del progreso.
✅ 正确答案
C. Its definition is overly broad, enabling superficial measures.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first