The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike previous epochs, which were characterized by natural climate shifts and biological evolution, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic forces such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and accelerated species extinction. Proponents argue that these markers are stratigraphically distinct and globally synchronous, justifying a formal boundary. Critics, however, contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, arguing that human influence began at different times across regions, undermining a single global start date. This debate highlights a broader tension between scientific classification and societal narrative, raising questions about how we periodize Earth's history when human agency becomes a primary geological agent.
❓ 인류세(Anthropocene)를 지지하는 측과 비판하는 측 사이의 주요 쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동이 심각한 환경 변화를 초래했는지 여부
B. 인류세가 명확한 전 지구적 시작점을 가진 공식적인 지질 시대(epoch)로 간주되어야 하는지 여부
C. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염이 환경에 해로운지 여부
D. 현대 시대에도 자연적인 기후 변동이 여전히 발생하는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene should be considered a formal geological epoch with a clear global start
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first