The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural phenomena such as glacial shifts or mass extinctions, the Anthropocene is marked by markers like radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Some scientists argue that human influence, while pervasive, has not yet produced a stratigraphic signature distinct enough to justify a new epoch on the geological timescale. Others counter that the rapid and irreversible changes to biodiversity and climate constitute a clear boundary, comparable to the transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between the long-term perspective of geology and the urgent, short-term concerns of contemporary environmental science.
❓ アントロポセンを新たな地質時代として公式に認定することに関する主な論点は何ですか?
A. 人間の影響が、十分に明確で永続的な層序記録を生み出したかどうか。
B. 「アントロポセン」という用語が科学的に正確であるか、それとも単なる人気のある比喩に過ぎないか。
C. アントロポセン(人新世)の指標が完新世のものとあまりにも類似しているかどうか。
D. 人間の活動が地球のシステムに何らかの重大な変化を引き起こしたかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
Whether human impact has created a sufficiently distinct and lasting stratigraphic record.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first