The concept of 'ecological footprint' has become a central tool in measuring human impact on the environment. Originally developed by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees in the 1990s, it quantifies the amount of biologically productive land and water required to sustain a population's consumption patterns and absorb its waste. However, critics argue that the metric oversimplifies complex environmental interactions, ignoring factors such as biodiversity loss and the uneven distribution of resources. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains influential in policy-making, as it provides a tangible comparison of consumption across nations, prompting debates on sustainability and equity. Recent studies have refined the methodology to include carbon emissions more accurately, yet the debate over its validity persists, highlighting the tension between quantitative simplicity and ecological reality.
❓ Theo đoạn văn, chỉ trích chính đối với dấu chân sinh thái là gì?
A. Vấn đề này quá phức tạp để các nhà hoạch định chính sách có thể hiểu được.
B. Nó không tính đến sự mất mát đa dạng sinh học và phân bố tài nguyên.
C. Nó được phát triển trước những năm 1990 và đã lỗi thời.
D. Nó chỉ đo lượng khí thải carbon và bỏ qua các yếu tố khác.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for biodiversity loss and resource distribution.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first