The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike the Holocene, which began approximately 11,700 years ago and witnessed the rise of human civilization, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout from atomic tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, its formal recognition remains contentious. Critics argue that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence, as different societies have contributed to environmental change at varying times and intensities. Proponents counter that the Anthropocene captures the unprecedented scale and global reach of modern human activity, urging collective responsibility for planetary stewardship. The debate thus reflects deeper questions about how science frames humanity's role in shaping the Earth's future.
❓ 一部の批評家が人新世の正式な認定に反対する主な理由は何ですか？
A. A. それは、人間活動が生態系に与えるプラスの影響を無視している。
B. B. それは、時代や地域を超えた多様で不平等な人間の貢献を考慮に入れていない。
C. C. それは地質学的指標として核フォールアウトのみに依存している。
D. D. それは完新世が人間の影響を一切受けなかったことを示唆している。
✅ 正确答案
B. It fails to account for the varied and unequal human contributions across time and regions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first