The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike earlier epochs, which were delineated by natural phenomena such as glacial cycles or mass extinctions, the Anthropocene is marked by a suite of anthropogenic signatures, including radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics in sedimentary layers, and a dramatic spike in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Proponents argue that these markers are stratigraphically distinct and globally synchronous, warranting formal recognition. However, skeptics contend that the term's utility is more cultural than scientific, as human-induced changes occur at varying rates across regions, complicating the establishment of a single, clean boundary. This debate highlights the tension between geological precision and the broader narrative of planetary stewardship, raising questions about how science defines epochs in an era of pervasive human agency.
❓ 本文によると、一部の科学者が人新世を地質時代として正式に定めることに反対する主な理由は何か。
A. A. 人間の影響はまだ地層には見えていない。
B. B. 提案されたマーカーは、タイミングにおいて全体的に一貫性がありません。
C. C. この用語には科学的根拠や関連性がまったくない。
D. D. 放射性同位体が唯一の信頼できる指標である。
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed markers are not globally consistent in timing.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first