The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which are identified by natural stratigraphic markers such as ice cores or rock layers, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic signals including nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that human influence, while profound, does not yet constitute a distinct geological boundary, as it lacks a clear and globally synchronous marker in the stratigraphic record. Proponents counter that the rapid acceleration of these human-induced changes since the mid-20th century, known as the 'Great Acceleration', provides compelling evidence for a new epoch. This debate highlights the complex interplay between scientific classification and human agency in shaping planetary history.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 과학자들이 인류세의 공식 인정을 반대하는 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향은 지질학적 과정을 바꿀 만큼 충분히 중요하지 않다.
B. B. 제안된 지표들, 예를 들어 플라스틱 오염 같은 경우, 지질학적 시간 규모에 걸쳐 지속되지 않는다.
C. C. 이 시대(epoch)에 대해 명확하고 전 지구적으로 동시성 있는 층서학적 지표가 존재하지 않는다.
D. D. '대가속(Great Acceleration)'은 경계로 간주하기에는 너무 점진적으로 발생했다.
✅ 正确答案
C. There is no clear and globally synchronous stratigraphic marker for the epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first