The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels serve as stratigraphic signatures distinct from natural processes. However, critics contend that the term lacks formal precision, as human activities vary widely in temporal and spatial scale, making it difficult to establish a globally synchronous boundary. Moreover, some scholars suggest that framing this period as a distinct epoch oversimplifies the complex interplay between human societies and environmental systems, potentially obscuring regional differences in ecological change. Despite these debates, the Anthropocene concept has proven useful for interdisciplinary research, prompting scientists to reconsider the relationship between humanity and the planet, and to develop more integrated approaches to environmental management.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 보는 것에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 환경 변화에 있어 핵 기술의 역할을 무시한다.
B. B. 그것은 인간 영향의 전 세계적 균일성을 설명하지 못한다.
C. C. 그것은 정확하고 전 세계적으로 일관된 시작점이 부족하다.
D. D. 그것은 지역적 생태 차이를 지나치게 강조한다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It lacks a precise and globally consistent starting point.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first