The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, proposing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. While the term has yet to be formally ratified as a geological epoch, its proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks the distinct and global stratigraphic signature required for formal geological classification, suggesting instead that it may be more accurately described as an ongoing historical event rather than a new epoch. This debate underscores the broader challenge of integrating human timescales with the deep temporal frameworks of geology, raising questions about how scientific disciplines define and periodize planetary change.
❓ この文章によると、人新世に関する意見の相違の主な論点は何ですか?
A. A) 人間の活動が地球のシステムに何らかの測定可能な影響を及ぼしているかどうか。
B. B) 人新世が正式に地質時代として認識され得るかどうか。
C. C) 核降下物やプラスチック汚染が環境に有害であるかどうか。
D. D) 地質学的時間尺度を、人類の歴史を含めるように改訂すべきかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
B) Whether the Anthropocene can be formally recognized as a geological epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first