The concept of 'environmental determinism' once dominated geographical thought, positing that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and topographical conditions. However, this theory has been widely criticized for its oversimplification and potential to justify colonialism. Modern scholarship instead emphasizes 'possibilism', which argues that while the environment sets certain constraints, human agency and technological innovation play a decisive role in overcoming these limits. For instance, the Netherlands has transformed its low-lying terrain through advanced water management systems, demonstrating that human ingenuity can modify environmental influences. Nevertheless, critics of possibilism contend that it underestimates the vulnerability of societies to extreme natural events, such as tsunamis or prolonged droughts, which can overwhelm even the most adaptive communities. Thus, contemporary geography adopts a nuanced perspective, recognizing the interplay between environmental forces and human choices without privileging either.
❓ この文章によると、「可能主義」に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. それは、気候が社会を形成する上での役割を無視している。
B. それは、深刻な自然災害に対処する人間の能力を過大評価している。
C. それは領土拡大のための植民地的正当化を支持している。
D. それは技術の進歩を認識することに失敗している。
✅ 正确答案
It overestimates human ability to cope with severe natural disasters.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first