The concept of 'cultural hybridity' has gained significant traction in postcolonial studies, referring to the blending of distinct cultural traditions that emerges from colonial and migratory encounters. Unlike earlier models of cultural assimilation, which assumed a one-way flow from dominant to subordinate cultures, hybridity emphasizes the agency of colonized or marginalized groups in actively reshaping cultural forms. However, scholars like Homi Bhabha argue that hybridity is not merely a descriptive term for cultural mixing; rather, it functions as a subversive strategy that disrupts the authority of colonial discourse by revealing its inherent contradictions. This perspective has been critiqued for overstating the political potential of cultural ambiguity, potentially obscuring persistent power asymmetries. Nevertheless, hybridity remains a valuable analytical lens for understanding how global cultural flows are negotiated in local contexts, particularly in urban centers where transnational communities interact daily.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 바바가 제안한 문화적 혼종성 개념의 핵심 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 소외된 집단의 주체성을 인정하지 못한다.
B. 문화적 혼합이 항상 일방적이라고 가정한다.
C. 그것은 문화적 모호성의 정치적 영향을 과장할 수 있다.
D. 그것은 식민 담론이 문화 형성에 미치는 역할을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
It may exaggerate the political impact of cultural ambiguity.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first