The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geographical scholarship. This theory posits that human activities and societal development are primarily shaped by climatic conditions and physical geography. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions were seen as less conducive to technological progress. However, modern geographers have largely rejected this deterministic framework, emphasizing instead the role of human agency, cultural adaptation, and technological innovation. They contend that environmental factors provide opportunities and constraints, but do not dictate outcomes. For instance, the Netherlands has thrived despite its flood-prone lowlands through engineering, while arid regions like the Middle East have become global economic hubs due to oil extraction. Thus, the shift from determinism to possiblism reflects a broader recognition of human resilience and creativity in overcoming environmental challenges.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 현대 지리학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 기후가 인간 사회에 영향을 미치지 않는다고 믿는다.
B. B. 그들은 인간의 창의성과 적응력이 환경적 한계를 극복할 수 있다고 주장한다.
C. C. 그들은 기술 발전이 사회 발전의 유일한 원인이라고 생각한다.
D. D. 그들은 열대 지역이 온대 지역보다 더 높은 문명을 가지고 있다는 것을 발견했다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that human creativity and adaptation can overcome environmental limitations.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first