The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct boundary. However, critics contend that the term overstates human influence, pointing to natural variability and the uneven distribution of anthropogenic signals across geological records. They also warn that formalizing the Anthropocene could blur the line between geological classification and political advocacy, potentially undermining scientific objectivity. Despite this debate, the term has proven useful for interdisciplinary research, prompting discussions about sustainability and planetary stewardship that transcend traditional academic boundaries.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세(Anthropocene) 시대를 공식화하는 것에 대한 비판자들이 제기하는 주요 우려는 무엇인가?
A. A) 이 용어는 자연적인 기후 변동성을 설명하지 못한다.
B. B) 공식적인 인정은 지질학과 행동주의를 혼합함으로써 과학적 중립성을 훼손할 수 있다.
C. C) 인위적 지표는 암석층에서 감지될 만큼 충분히 밀집되어 있지 않다.
D. D) 이 개념은 학제 간 협력을 저해한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) Formal recognition might compromise scientific neutrality by mixing geology with activism.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first